[This post
is written as a response to Randy’s. I originally intended on this being a mere
comment on his post, but it ended up being much longer than I expected. Everyone can read and respond to this, but it would of course make much more sense if Randy's post is read prior to doing so.]
First, I
must say that I wholeheartedly believe Kincaid's statement that "The
examination isn't the examined" is proverbial when it comes to the
sciences. I absolutely loved science as a child and on into the beginning of my
high school career, but after that point I began to feel disenchanted by the
cold, rational view that was quickly enveloping all that I used to consider
beautifully mysterious. I quite abruptly abandoned my academic pursuit of the
sciences as I reached the conclusion that some things are better left in
mystery—that a balance between humanistic emotional experience and rationality
is vital to a healthy life.
However, I
do not think Kincaid's statement applies equally to one's understanding of
language. I do not think an advanced knowledge of the inner workings of
language can "ruin the amazing thing that it set out to explain in the
first place, by turning it into a cold, pedestrian paradigm." On the
contrary, I believe that such an understanding enables us to form more complex
thoughts about our lives and the world in which we live—language, with all its
intricate structures, is still a beautifully functioning whole, for it is only
through these structures that it may function at all. We, as skilled writers
(and future advisors), need not break down sentences into bits of grammatical
terms, consequently losing sight of the meaning and value of the thought being
expressed; rather, we may use this advanced knowledge of language to help the
original thought develop into all it can be. Language is, after all, a tool
human kind has developed to convey organic thoughts and emotions to others. With
our understanding of its fundamental aspects, we may better manipulate words to
communicate a thought, idea, or emotion in its purest form, untarnished by misunderstandings
that result from a less complete grasp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I, too, have experienced the uneducated
approach to language and life in general—I am the first person in my family to
attend college, and I was raised by a single mother who had "arguably no
skill" in any sort of formal communication. She, like your step father,
does not "lingually disassemble [her] examined world," and remains in
a somewhat helpless state of mere examination. In her mindset, the world is
unquestionably Biblical; she lives today according to the very same teachings
she was taught as a child by her parents (a farmer and a Cherokee who did not
complete high school), never questioning this apparent authority. When she
encounters something she does not understand, she searches for an explanation
through power figures rather than attempting to delve into original,
independent thought.
I know not
all of those lacking an advanced education see the world as my mother does, and
of course, I must agree that there is a certain beauty to the simplicity of
such lifestyles; however, throughout my childhood, I witnessed their flaws all
too frequently to desire a similar approach. My mother's lack of any sort of ability
to disassemble her world has left her depressed and closed-minded. Because she
cannot seem to analyze the world on her own without her not-so-chosen
authority's guidance, she feels trapped in a world she does not understand, yet
unable to even consider alternative perspectives when they're presented to her
by others.
While it
isn't necessarily formalized communication that enables us to assess the world
around us, I do think having a decent secular education (although it need not
be traditional) and an advanced understanding of language helps us to see
the full extent of the mystery and wonder of life with a peaceful, open mind.
From what I have witnessed, lacking these things results in a very
uncontrolled state of nearly unconscious action—my mother, for instance, has
never harnessed any fraction of ability to choose how she reacts to any
circumstance. The benefit of being a skilled communicator comes in to play as
one seeks to examine the world in which we live on a more complex level—our thoughts
are limited by the extent of our knowledge and awareness, and because of this I
believe that continuing to advance one’s understanding of language can only
further free one’s mind from the confines of outside authorities. Through this
process, beauty, wonder, and mystery are not lost; they are seen and experienced in full color.
No comments:
Post a Comment